[IronPython] FePy SourceForge website updates
Terry L. Triplett
c0d3g33k at gmail.com
Sat Sep 30 08:25:23 PDT 2006
Your comment seems to directly contradict what Larry Rosen said in the
article. The article discusses how "give it away to the public domain"
statements aren't licenses (and perhaps even legally risky to the donor),
then ends with the following recommendation:
"If you want to give away software for any use whatsoever, use a simple
license such as the MIT license."
So yes, the MIT license and similar *are* actually licenses.
Not to mention less crude than dropping the F-bomb, which was originally the
point I was trying to make. The fact that even if elegantly worded the
"DWTFYW" 'license' may not be a good one is a good issue to raise. Keep in
mind, though, that the author of the license doesn't seem to be a resident
of the US, so none of the above may be applicable.
On 9/30/06, Sylvain Hellegouarch <sh at defuze.org> wrote:
> Mind you it seems some people believe the public domain license such as
> the MIT one is actually not a license:
> http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/6225 via
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the users