[IronPython] IronPython and Python 3

[Michael Foord]

Dino Viehland wrote:
> We haven't had much in the ways of discussing supporting Py3k features yet and it might still be a little too early to do so.  We have been following some of the changes and we'll probably start following the changes a little more closely.
>
> We also still have some catching up to do with v2.5 (1.1alpha has some improved support but is still missing a couple of features) as well.  So no current plans yet but as that changes we'll be sure to let the community know.
>   
Ok, great.

So your only settled plans are to continue to support Python 2.X 
features (including 2.6 ones ?), but no decision yet on how to deal with 
Python 3.

Michael Foord
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/index.shtml

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-bounces at lists.ironpython.com [mailto:users-bounces at lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Anthony Baxter
> Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 11:06 PM
> To: Discussion of IronPython
> Subject: Re: [IronPython] IronPython and Python 3
>
> On 1/21/07, Michael Foord <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk> wrote:
>   
>> Hello all,
>>
>> What is the IronPython team's intention with respect to Python 2.X and
>> Python 3 ?
>>     
>
> Note that Py3K is still a work in progress. Py2.6 will attempt to
> support (through use of from __future__, &c) compatibility with 2.5 as
> well as (hopefully) a lot of 3.0-isms.
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.ironpython.com
> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.ironpython.com
> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
>
>