[IronPython] IronPython/NWSGI 0-byte 200/404 response with HelloWorld?

Jeff Hardy jdhardy at gmail.com
Fri Sep 25 11:52:09 PDT 2009

Hi Vernon,
I presume you're talking django-mssql
(http://code.google.com/p/django-mssql/)? I always wondered why it had
its own database layer.

I don't think adodbapi is the best place to have django (or any other
ORM) specific stuff. django-mssql shoul talk to your module, and then
it should (in theory!) get IronPython support for free once you add
it. Maybe see what the django-mssql guys think about that? If adodbapi
is part of pywin32 (right?), I would think that depending on it should
be relatively uncontroversial.

This is all IMHO, of course. I don't know what the django-mssql guys
would think. But I think adodbapi should focus on being a dbapi
implementation, and let the various ORMs provide the adaptors, much
like how they handle sqlite or postgres or mysql.

- Jeff

On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Vernon Cole <vernondcole at gmail.com> wrote:
> Jeff:
>    I looked at this project a while back, but have not done much with it
> yet.  One twist I see is that the ms-sql support for django is based on a
> copy of my adodbapi package which was forked before IronPython support was
> added.  I wonder whether my next effort should be to include some specific
> django support in adodbapi so that it can be used, rather than the forked
> version. I intend to make adodbapi use real ADO.NET calls, rather than COM,
> in the next version. My hope is to make one dbapi which will do IronPython,
> storm, and django all at the same time. What's your advise on this?
> --
> Vernon Cole
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Jeff Hardy <jdhardy at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:53 AM, Markus Törnqvist <mjt at nysv.org> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 06:59:41PM +0300, Markus T�rnqvist wrote:
>> >
>> > Hate to be upping my posts this way, but no one's seen this?
>> Hi Markus,
>> There are some issues with Django still; I don't think they're
>> impossible to solve. I wouldn't try 0.96; it's too old to be worth
>> bothering with, and it doesn't work either.
>> I'd like to help more, but I'm a bit overwhelmed at the moment - sorry.
>> - Jeff
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.ironpython.com
>> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.ironpython.com
> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com

More information about the Users mailing list